September 10, 2010

Waiting to be picked down on the docks

Job hunting online is the equivalent of throwing a penny into Lake Superior and hoping it somehow lands on the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald. Or something.

Point is, it's a long shot process. Oh sure, I had a couple nibbles a few weeks ago, but that was the culmination of literally scores of applications going back to January.

Back in my day. . .

*overturning the milking pail, taking a seat and breaking out my whittlin' blade*

Back in my day, which is to say when I graduated from college in 1998, practically every hiring company required a hardcopy resume and cover letter, which you had to mail with a stamp and everything. I mean, you had to put some serious effort into being rejected.

Nowadays, you can just click "Apply Now," attach your resume as a .doc file, scrawl out a cover letter--which is even conveniently spell checked, if you so wish--and then you click "Send" and wait for a confirmation e-mail to land in your inbox, after which follows several weeks, if not months, of silence. If you're really lucky, you'll get a rejection e-mail, but mostly nothing happens. So, it's still all about swimming through the rejections, but you can send out the applications so much faster.

So that's progress, I guess.

One major drawback to this online application process is that I've sent so many applications out to companies over the months, I can't remember all of them. I've had two phone interviews, during which I spent the first five minutes trying to figure out which job it was the company was advertising for. I could be mistaken, but it can't bode well for the first impression when you have to interrupt and say "I'm sorry, but what position was this for again?"

I find one of my bigger stumbling blocks is that I've been writing for the information technology (IT) space for so long, I'm wary of stepping too far out of my comfort zone. Plus, freelance requests have been coming in pretty regularly from my previous employer and others, so that kind of reinforces this idea that I have to write for an IT audience. Writing jobs are hard enough to come by without handicapping yourself with stupid limitations.

I was approved to be an Examiner.com writer several months ago, but after a couple experiences trying to write for them, I decided their business model of not paying writers boo unless the article gets a jillian Web hits isn't quite my cup of tea.

Not that there aren't a lot of hungry writers out there willing to craft 500 word missives in the hopes of scoring the big hit. That's the other thing: there's a lot of writing competition out there. They're not necessarily GOOD writers, but the Internet today tends to favor quantity over quality, which is a strange shift, now that I think about it.

I'm not too worried yet, because as I said I have freelance writing and checks coming in through the rest of the year, so it's not like I'm going to lose my house next month and find myself on a street corner with a hand-scrawled cardboard sign that reads "Jobless. Please give. God bless." Still, I have my concerns.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some job rejections I must apply for.

Posted by Ryan at 03:28 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

September 08, 2010

Silencio

Yes, this ThunderJournal has been quiet for awhile. I'm working on two freelance articles and, as you know, those pay the bills. This ThunderJournal hasn't paid a bill since August of 2007.

Don't worry. I'll have something up before the end of the week.

Posted by Ryan at 12:38 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
I use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit my website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.