March 30, 2006

Oh look, the shoe's on the other foot

Let's see if I have this right. When affirmative action and gender balancing are seen to be working FOR the people they're designed for, it's viewed as a public good (even though they're usually basically thinly-veiled policies of reverse-racism/prejudice).

HOWEVER, if those same policies eventually, and predictably, start to IMPEDE those who they were meant to empower. . . well, we can't have that.

MONEY QUOTE: What are the consequences of young men discovering that even if they do less, they have more options? And what messages are we sending young women that they must, nearly 25 years after the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment, be even more accomplished than men to gain admission to the nation's top colleges?

Duhhhhh, us lazy men can do less and have more options, duhhhh. Me see bird, ME SMASH!

Let's see, men can now do less, and women have to be more accomplished than that? Good, solid argument.

Is it wrong that this is amusing me so much?

You Don't Say. . .

One thing that I think a lot of people don't realize about journalists is that we're not, as a whole, drastically informed on many of the topics we cover. In fact, it's standard practice for many newsrooms to rotate beat reporters to ensure a fresh take on articles, so a city council reporter may be shifted to the court beat, or a business reporter may be shifted to a metro beat. Not all newsrooms do this, but it was taught to me as such in college, so I assume quite a few do.

Factor into this the fact that journalists, in my mind, are writers first, and thinkers second. Myself, I got into the field because I was decent with the written word, and I realized I'd never have to take another math-related class via the journalism route.

All of this is just my way of pointing out that journalists, by and large, aren't some great pool of mental giants, which explains why something like this can be written, and then missed by several editing passes:

Among other things, the legislation would make it a crime to be in this country illegally.

Or maybe, just maybe, a lot of people just can't make the distinction between immigrants and ILLEGAL immigrants.

UPDATE: Holy fuckin' shit.

Posted by Ryan at 09:27 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack

March 28, 2006

You Know What's Disconcerting?

I'll tell you what's disconcerting. After about two weeks of being unable to access your blog at work, or the publishing system behind you blog, and coming to the conclusion that it's entirely probable that it's the result of a concious act on the part of the company where you work.

Posted by Ryan at 03:56 PM | Comments (9) | TrackBack
I use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit my website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.