January 23, 2006
My First Ever "Not Safe For Work Post"
Based off an e-mail I received from my sister-in-law, I thought I'd post my first ever not safe for work entry. Be advised: the extended entry features exposed female breasts, and is photographic evidence as to why the Chinese routinely outperform Americans when it comes to math.
So the picture of your rear-end is considered appropriate for work?
Posted by: Mandy at January 24, 2006 11:06 AMNot only is my rear end appropriate for work, by this time it's practically a work of art.
Posted by: Ryan at January 24, 2006 11:22 AMOkay, so I link to instapundit in a way that isn't going to show up on his trackback and you're like, "If I didn't know better I'd say you were trying to get instapundit to link back to you so you'd get more web traffic."
Then you're all, "Hey, Internet-- TITS!"
And I'm the hitcount whore.
I don't think so.
Posted by: Joshua at January 24, 2006 06:51 PMOn a completely separate note, I can't believe those girls aren't models. I think they must be. I've seen literally thousands of regular topless women (read: not strippers or models-- Burning Man, various pagan festivals, the '70s) and I've never seen that many perfect racks in one place without a rack wrangler on the job.
Posted by: Joshua at January 24, 2006 06:55 PMI've never heard the term "Rack Wrangler" before. It amuses me to no end.
Posted by: Ryan at January 24, 2006 08:44 PMAnd, Joshua, I'm a total hit count whore: the faster I find myself blogging for a living, the better, though it will never happen. I'm not nearly thoughtful enough in my posts to garner a gi-normous following. A man can dream though.
However, in this case, I posted because it amused me, not because I thought exposed tits would earn me more hits which, now that I think about it, it probably will. Sex sells? Who knew?
You're right though. It's likely a Playboy photo. But the comparison is still funny.
Posted by: Ryan at January 24, 2006 11:46 PM
Stumble It!
