February 04, 2005

Disclosure

This was going to be a comment in response to David, but it got pretty long:

David:

you are so fucking obviously biased (evidenced by selective outrage and selective memory, as well as the different standards applied to conservative vs. liberal writers) yet you try to pretend you are not

No. I don't. I've responded to you a gazzilion times on this. I view my political stance to be in the Libertarian fold. I've told you this. My blog is a place for my opinions, and those opinions are pretty obvious. If it outrages you that I have these opinions, without stating each and every time that they're my opinions, well, boo fucking hoo. I'm not making a secret out of it, so please fucking try to remember it this time. I'm not sure what you want me to admit to, since I've written here, and on many other blogs, including yours, my opinions, countless times.

And I'm not putting myself out as an unbiased media critic. fucking-A, I write for IBM magazines, and my shit gets infused with so much marketing-speak and legal review, it can hardly be considered unbiased. That's my point, that an unbiased media is a fucking MYTH. I've written shit now for daily and weekly newspapers, as well as magazines, and at each job I've had editors tweak the language because "we don't want to appear biased." Well, fine, but the bias is still there, even though it may not APPEAR to be. Do I tend to sniff at liberal bias more? Probably, because in my opinion liberal bias tries to sneak in under the radar. I mean, Fox News, quite obviously, is awash with conservative bias. They practically scream it at you. MSNBC.com stuff, on the other hand, often slides stuff out that is slanted liberally, yet with more subtlety.

The whole Dan Rather flap, for example. That screamed of liberal bias masquerading as unbiased reporting. I mean, come on. CBS officials agreeing to put an arguably delusional source in contact with the Kerry campaign, for a report about Bush's duty-dodging, THE DAY BEFORE the Kerry campaign unveiled their Fortunate Son message? Puh-lease.

yet you try to pretend you are not, and you hide behind some phony-baloney "professional cred"

You know what? Go fuck yourself. Seriously, insert your penis into your ass, back and forth, till you're sore. Rinse, repeat.

I'm a journalist by education and profession. My experiences in the field are entirely my own, and I have my opinions because of those experiences, most of which have fueled my belief that unbiased media is a, let's say it again, MYTH. If you think that my experiences just equal a "phoney-baloney street cred," well, you can just go fuck off.

Again, I've made no secret that I work for an IBM marketing arm. Ooh, you really got me there. On the same token, I've never claimed to be un-biased. I HAVE claimed that non-bias is a fucking MYTH.

My political leanings, such as they are, are thus:

Stop raising my fucking taxes in a futile attempt to stamp out poverty. I'm sick of it. I work at the IBM marketing arm to make money, and I want that money, so stop taking it away from me to feed Tiny Tim. I can handle some taxation to that end, but only so much. You could take my entire paycheck and put it toward social services, and there would still be people who would STILL be poor and miserable. I'd like to keep that money, thank you. I'm pro-abortion, but not within the third tri-mester. I think women should probably keep the right to vote. I'm flexible on this issue. I'm kidding. I think women should have parity with men, except they shouldn't grow penises. That would be wrong. I'm for the right to bear arms, but I think there should be some limit as to what those arms should be; I don't necessarily think people should be equipped with Street Sweepers, in the off-beat chance an army materializes in front of them. I don't trust the U.N. As of just a couple years ago, I thought they were God's gift to world order; now I don't think that. I think the U.N. is a corrupt, do-nothing monolith that enables dictatorships. I think the U.N. is, in fact, an impediment to world stability. I don't think all that much of President Bush. I think entirely less of Sen. Kerry. I think Howard Dean is a self-important ass. I'm sick and fucking tired of hearing that the GOP is a party of evil, fat cat, power-mongers, and permutations on that theme. I think hardcore pornography rocks! I tend to side with the Israeli cause rather than the Palestinians. I think gays should be able to marry whoever they fucking want, just please don't kiss and fondle in front of me because. . . *shudder* Unless you're a lesbian, then please, chow box in front of me. Unless you're Rosie O'Donnell, then please, don't. I think the Middle East is a cesspool that can probably only be changed through aggressive diplomacy with the very real threat of military force. I'm pissed off that all those fucking dinosaurs had to go and die over there, and then decay, and become oil deposits under all that fucking useless desert sand. I think France is silly. I think Great Britain kicks ass. Australia, too. Japan also. I don't trust China. Or Iran. Or Uzbekistan, because they're always up to something. So is Portugal. I love the United States of America, even when it sucks.

Please, David, let me know if I've missed anything here.

UPDATE: To augment all of my above points, Simon just provided me with a "picture-worth-a-thousand-words."

Read-My-Lips.jpg

Posted by Ryan at February 4, 2005 11:10 AM
Comments

*woot*

Posted by: Joseph at February 4, 2005 10:44 PM

Live from the White Arse?

The original caption was 'Read my lips'.

Posted by: Simon at February 4, 2005 11:22 PM

Simon, the caption is the same. Just let your pointer hover over the picture. Did you do this, by the way? If not, who? And, it made me laugh for about seven straight minutes. The Star Wars one is still funnier, but this still gets an A for effort.

Posted by: Ryan at February 4, 2005 11:33 PM

Thanks for the props Ryan - I guess my day job (graphic designer) comes in handy sometimes. You're right though - the Star Wars one certainly is a smoking hot specimen of photoshop skills. Perhaps you should run a competition.

I'm using Firefox to browse, which I love, but it doesn't seem to do that tool-tippy thing you mention.

Posted by: Simon at February 5, 2005 02:44 AM

Dayum. Remind me not to piss you off. EVER.

Kay?

Posted by: Margi at February 5, 2005 04:08 PM

Stop raising my fucking taxes in a futile attempt to stamp out poverty.

Straw man. Read a book.

I don't necessarily think people should be equipped with Street Sweepers, in the off-beat chance an army materializes in front of them.

So, not really as Libertarian as all that; 'cause that's exactly why most Libertarians want guns.

And just by the way, that's an off-beat use of "off-beat". It's okay though: I know those kinds of grammar experiments are deep seeded in your personality.

I'm sick and fucking tired of hearing that the GOP is a party of evil, fat cat, power-mongers, and permutations on that theme.

Because it's obvious, or because it's repetitive?

I think Great Britain kicks ass.

Except Great Britain runs opposite your positions on taxation for social programs, gun control, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But hey, they joined the U.S. in that war you supported, so they kick ass!

Not that I think you suffer from sociopolitical tunnel vision or anything.

I love the United States of America, even when it sucks.

Except the poor part. Fuck those guys, man.

Posted by: Joshua at February 6, 2005 06:18 PM

Yeah, Joshua, because I think my views align more with the Libertarian side, I automatically have to adhere to their entire politcal agenda. Whatever, man.

Come to Minnesota, where taxation is sky high, and Nick Coleman continues to rail about the plight of the poor. But, yeah, I really hate those poor people. I club them like baby seals each chance I get.

Because it's obvious, or because it's repetitive?

Cute. Intellectually lazy, for you. But cute.

And Japan has an Emperor figurehead, so I should hate them, too, I suppose.

Posted by: Ryan at February 6, 2005 11:19 PM

you guys are all nuts, screaming at eachother over the internet when in fact your points of view aren't so off from one another in the grand scheme of things.

i'll just say i agreed with most of what you wrote in your little summary there, except for the attitude. oh, and the porn. i'm not into hardcore porn. i also agree with most of what joshua countered with.

just a lot of minced words. makes for good reading though.

Posted by: leblanc at February 7, 2005 12:18 AM

Guys aren't happy unless they're arguing, Leblanc. It's a weird quirk amongst us penis equipped folk.

Oh, also, Joshua? After the whole "criminal being" flap, you have no basis on which to fault me on grammatical crap. Truly, that was kind of insulting, gobble, gobble me if you want, but it was. Mmmkay?

Posted by: Ryan at February 7, 2005 01:22 AM

Well I guess
">that explains this. I didn't want to believe it at first, but now that you've admitted it...

Frankly, I shocked and horrified by this behavior. Shocked and horrified, I tell you.

Posted by: Joshua at February 7, 2005 01:33 AM

Truly, that was kind of insulting

Ha.

And I have no basis on which to fault you on grammatical crap? No basis whatsoever on which to fault you on it? None?

Heh.

Beer.

Posted by: Joshua at February 7, 2005 01:36 AM

Okay, I'm off to bed, but shit, Joshua, that's fucking funny. Again, not quite as close as the Star Wars thing, but. . . shit . . . laughing again!

Posted by: Ryan at February 7, 2005 01:40 AM

What, the Michael Moore "Ass-cars" thing? That was ME, not Joshua. Surprised you haven't put it up yet - I'm dying for the recognition.

Seriously, you should run a page on it's own, with maybe a competition or something.

Posted by: Simon at February 7, 2005 03:47 AM

Simon-- you can just upload your pic to ImageShack and then post the link here.

Posted by: red ruffian at February 7, 2005 07:11 AM

Can't now, cos that PC is now in bits (for a few days at least), but Ryan's got a copy . . .

Posted by: Simon at February 7, 2005 07:55 AM

Leblanc - The devil's in the details. I agree with 98% of what Ryan says, but politically in the search for the lessor of two evils we choose fairly regularly differently. Sometimes it takes the power rants to remind everyone of how much they agree on... especially the hardcore.

Posted by: e. at February 7, 2005 10:05 AM

O.K.....wait....I'm still unsure of who's is bigger.

Posted by: Lily at February 7, 2005 11:59 AM

Please ignore the horrid grammar of the previous comment.

Posted by: Lily at February 7, 2005 03:24 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!